Peer Reviews.

Peer review for Moe Hunt from Kyle Hill.

1. What worked well? Elaborate?

The subject is very interesting.

2. What needs improvement? Elaborate?

Needs more persuasive opinions in the paper.

3. What is paper about? Is it clear?

Not quite sure yet, needs to be finished.

4. Examine the MLA Works Cited, and In-text Citation

Not finished yet.

Peer Review for Moe Hunt from Kris Russel.

1. What worked well? Elaborate?

The topic is interesting and so far, it's intriguing.

2. What needs improvement? Elaborate?

Needs to be longer.

3. What is paper about? Is it clear?

The paper is about stereotypes and absences of minorities in Television.

4. Examine the MLA Works Cited, and In-text Citation.

Okay.

Peer Review for Kris Russel by Moe Hunt.

1. What worked well? Elaborate?

He seems to really be interested in his topic!

2. What needs improvement? Elaborate?

Maybe more info on side effects of steroids.

3. What is paper about? Is it clear?

About usage of steroids in baseball.

4. Examine the MLA Works Cited, and In-text Citation.

A OKAY!

Peer review for Kyle Hill by Moe Hunt.

1. What worked well? Elaborate?

He seemed very into his topic.

2. What needs improvement? Elaborate?

More realistic data.

3. What is paper about? Is it clear?

His paper is about homosexuality. Yes, it is clear.

4. Examine the MLA Works Cited, and In-text Citation.

Good to go.